|
|
Post by EVP on Oct 28, 2016 4:12:33 GMT
I've read talk about who's evidence can be trusted more: a small group of investigators or a large one? By small group I mean local groups who investigate paranormal activity because they have a passion for it. By large groups I mean groups like TAPS or Ghost Adventures, groups who solely get their income from being performers in front of a camera crew, groups that have historically faked evidence for views. As you may be able to tell, large groups are a point of contention for me. The shame is that there's no reason large groups have to be the way they are, it's just greed, plain and simple. But there are people I know personally who disagree with me, they say smaller groups are more likely to fake evidence in the hopes of landing themselves the next 8 o'clock spot on the SyFy channel. I can see and respect that viewpoint though I disagree with it. I want to hear everyone else's opinion on this though? Who do you find more credible? Or do you disagree entirely?
|
|
